old phee asked : 'y must marry? y cn nt just stay together?'
old phee asked : 'u gana once, she (ms v) took half of ur hse away u not scare ah?'
old phee said : 'sm1 rejected her, thr must b smthg tht is no gd (defective)'
old phee said : 'sm1 used her before, thn dun wan her alrdy, used before..'

old phee said, he dun agree to tis marriage, he will not ack me.

++

i think old phee got it all wrong.
i dun nd his ack.
i nvr nd anybody's ack.
i m unlike mr phee.

i think old phee got it all wrong.
his son is nt a millionaire, he dun hv alot of $ for me to 'dok'.
his son has 3 v young kids tht stil needs alot of attention, time & $.
his 3 grandchildren are all old enough to speak, whether i bully thm or nt.

and nowadays, even if is single, may also been 'used' before.
i think he is living in e 50s, or 60s.

whtever la..
is ur lost for nt loving me as ur dil (daughter inlaw)


***